Talk:Kellogg's/Archives/2019
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Conkgist in topic Consequences of Political Advocacy?
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Consequences of Political Advocacy?
A week ago I added a couple of lines noting Kellog's had laid off a lot of staff in an effort to reduce "... complexity and cost structures whilst maximising growth and profitabilty" though Breitbart attributed it to their advocacy. Nobody commented at the time so I forgot about it. I checked back today and notice that Squeak90 reverted it without explanation. Rather than simply start a potential revert war I figured I'd ask here in case there's a reason. If there's no response within a couple of days I'll unrevert. Thanks. 人族 (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Breitbart is not an acceptable reliable source on Wikipedia; therefore I've removed the section which is based on Breitbart-sourced claims. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Why? It's a national source with an interest in the organisation. Other sources which cover the subject tend to be very very local - Minneapolis Star Tribune for instance. This Philly news blog: http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/kelloggs-shutting-2-pa-plants-lays-off-500-in-delivery-switch-20170531.html suggests a quarter of the workforce of 36,000 has been fired, whereas http://www.supplychaindive.com/news/kelloggs-job-cuts-layoffs-supply-chain-distribution/445554/ suggests a 'mere' 4,500 have been sacked. 人族 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)