Talk:Keith Donnellan

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Andres in topic Stub

Stub

edit

This article says nothing about what this person's contributions to any of the categories to which he belongs may be. It consists merely of a statement of the person's cv. Needs major work. Further reading link did not lead to any further reading about this person, but rather to a general article about Reference, in which the same bibliographic note that is already on the page is repeated. Levalley (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I did find some references in this article on SEP [1] that could be worked in. BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 03:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
His article "Reference and definite descriptions" is a classic of the philosophy of language, and this is he is known after. His short biography by Kent Johnson is included in the Dictionary of American Philosophers, Tommes Press 2004. I have no copy of it but it can be found here (pdf). I think he definitely deserves an article. Andres (talk) 03:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply