Talk:Keith (song)/GA1
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
This shouldn't take too long --K. Peake 08:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Infobox and lead edit
- Shouldn't you write self-published instead of independent in the infobox since the latter may lead to readers thinking it is the label name?
- Since there is an article titled independent record label page I believe that independent is the right word to use. Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
*Directly after writing/production, mention the recording in the same sentence
- "it was independently released on" → "It was independently released as a single on" starting a new sentence here
"consider it a tribute song to him." → "to consider it as a tribute song to him."- ""Keith" peaked at" → "The song peaked at"
*New Zealand Hot Singles chart → New Zealand Hot Singles Chart, with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT
- "Bell sang the track on" → "Bell sang it on"
"Bell was lauded by" → "Bell was applauded by" per the body- "She also performed "Keith" in" → "She also performed the song in"
- Add a part about the synopsis
Background and release edit
*"when she brought the song to" → "when she brought the idea to"
- "songs take you back."" → "songs take you back"." per MOS:QUOTE
Mention that the release was as a single
Composition edit
*""Keith" is a country song" → "Musically, "Keith" is a country song"
- "and that she had it on her phone for year before deciding to" → "and was on her phone for year before she decided to"
- Remove speech marks around pays tribute since that is not a direct quote from both sources
"into our past."" → "into our past"." per MOS:QUOTE
Reception and promotion edit
- "Triple M stated that" → "The staff of Triple M stated that"
- Why are you using re-entered despite no previous position having been mentioned?
*"calling it "touchy"" → "calling it "touching"" per the source
"catchy it was."" → "catchy it was"." per MOS:QUOTE- "An official music video was" → "An official music video for the song was" with the wikilink
Track listing edit
- Good
Charts edit
- Good
Release history edit
- Good
References edit
- Copyvio score looks strong at 15.3%!!!
- What exactly makes Who a reliable source on ref 13?
- According to its article, it is the sister paper of People Magazine which is greenlit at WP:RSP. The only bit Who sources is the guitar one but I'm not opposed to removing it if you think it isn't reliable enough! Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Final comments and verdict edit
- On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 21:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake: Thanks a lot for reviewing! Let me know if I missed something. Cheers, Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sebbirrrr Either use the song's title only once in the lead or split into two paras and use it once in each, add mv synopsis and you need to write the staff of since that's reception. --K. Peake 10:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake: Done. Let me know how it looks now. Sebbirrrr (talk) 20:39, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass now, only had to do some quick copy editing! --K. Peake 21:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sebbirrrr Either use the song's title only once in the lead or split into two paras and use it once in each, add mv synopsis and you need to write the staff of since that's reception. --K. Peake 10:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)