Talk:Kedarnath Temple

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Kedarnath Temple → Kedarnath temple —

• WP:VERB - WP:AT Thaejas (talk) 03:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC).
• This article is about one temple at one place; "Kedarnath Temple" could be treated as a proper name?. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose Proper name, and so should be capitalised. Skinsmoke (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
• For consensus against this move, see Wikipedia_talk:Hinduism-related_topics_notice_board#Naming_convention--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kedarnath Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029193204/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=2 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029184513/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=3 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029192556/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=4 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=4
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029184226/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=6 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kedarnath Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604130933/http://rudraprayag.nic.in/Guptkashi.htm to http://rudraprayag.nic.in/Guptkashi.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090520171450/http://www.badrikedar.com/temple/GuptkashiVishwanath.html to http://www.badrikedar.com/temple/GuptkashiVishwanath.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071124004721/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-kedar.aspx?id=55 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-kedar.aspx?id=55

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Kedarnath Temple

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Kedarnath Temple's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "bisht":

• From Panch Kedar: Harshwanti Bisht (1994). Tourism in Garhwal Himalaya. Indus Publishing. pp. 84–86. ISBN 9788173870064. Retrieved 2009-07-05. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
• From Rudranath: Harshwanti Bisht (1994). Tourism in Garhwal Himalaya. Indus Publishing. pp. 84–86. ISBN 9788173870064. Retrieved 5 July 2009.
• From Madhyamaheshwar: Harshwanti Bisht (1994). Tourism in Garhwal Himalaya. Indus Publishing. pp. 84–86. ISBN 9788173870064. Retrieved 2009-07-05. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
• From Tourism in Uttarakhand: Harshwanti Bisht (1994). Tourism in Garhwal Himalaya. Indus Publishing. pp. 84–86. ISBN 9788173870064. Retrieved 5 July 2009. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

• Badrinath Temple Winter.jpg
• Kedarnath empty.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Buried in a glacier for 400 years?

I'm finding a few sources that claim that this temple was buried in a glacier for about 400 years, and apparently the claim was made in a report by the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology. However, I can't find any credible evidence to corroborate this claim. Is anyone familiar with this story? Littlejohn657 (talk) 00:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)