Talk:Kaz (Dragonlance)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaz (Dragonlance) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dungeons & Dragons

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Moving the page

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The page should not be titled Kaz the Minotaur, but Kaz (Dragonlance) instead. -- ReyBrujo 22:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Why is it stubbed?

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I don't quite understand the reason for the stub. The article seems of good length, its referenced, what's the problem? DoomsDay349 18:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

DoomsDay349,

I agree, the stub could be deleted now. I'll take care of it. Thanks for bringing this up. Reb 19:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

No problem. I was just looking over all the DL stubs and caught it. DoomsDay349 19:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic