Talk:Kawasaki Motors

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Dennis Bratland in topic Proposed merger

Image copyright problem with Image:Kawasaki.svg edit

The image Image:Kawasaki.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merger edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Kawasaki motorcyclesKawasaki Heavy Industries Motorcycle & Engine

"Kawasaki motorcycles" has little content, and an apparent intended expansion hasn't happened for over 7 years. The history information would help flesh out the "Motorcycles" section in this article. - BilCat (talk) 21:58, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose — per WP:POINT, WP:SURMOUNTABLE, WP:PERFECTION. Sorry the eventual expansion of this article hasn’t happened within your arbitrary time limit. At my age, 7 years isn’t all that long. I’d probably have more time to expand short articles if I wasn’t forced to bat away DOA merge, move and AfD proposals. But then again, the proposers would have time to create expanded content if they weren’t busy litigating. See WP:SOFIXIT. —Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
    • Note to the closer: Had I intended to be POINTY, I would have SOFIXedIT it myself by merging, and not notified anyone. Merry Christmas. - BilCat (talk) 01:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Can we close this? It has been months. I'd suggest taking this to a wider audience if anyone wants to pursue it. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.