Talk:Kawasaki C-2

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Fnlayson in topic Main accidents

Photograph edit

(not given supporting materials due to uncertainty over licensing of the photograph)

I am a user of a Japanese version.

Is the copyright in this photograph really GFDL?

Japan defense ministry Technical Research and Development Institute is forbidding reprint without permission in the photograph.

TRDI (Japanese)--210.131.1.48 13:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proper designation edit

What is this aircraft's proper designation - the article uses a mix of "C-X", "XC-2" and "C-2". It isn't always clear which designation relates to which stage of the development process. As I understand it the initial design was called "C-X", the test prototype(s) "XC-2" and the actual certified production version is the "C-2". I'm not at all sure that I understand it correctly and the article (as it is now) doesn't really help to clarify the matter. Roger (talk) 08:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The development program was designated C-X, The first prototype is designasted XC-2, the procurement program is designated C-2. Seemples, yes.Petebutt (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved: insufficient support. DrKiernan (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply



Kawasaki C-2Kawasaki XC-2 – To reflect the name of the aircraft rather than the procurement program. Per Kawasaki Heavy Industries' own website: http://www.khi.co.jp/english/aero/product/airplanes/xc_2.html memphisto 12:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oppose the XC-2 is only the prototype, if it doesnt go into production it may be appropriate but it is certain the series build aircraft will be C-2s. MilborneOne (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kawasaki C-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Checked. Redalert2fan (talk) 12:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Kawasaki C-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Checked. Redalert2fan (talk) 12:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Main accidents edit

Can somebody write in the article some sentences of accidents of this aircraft?--Porbóllett (talk) 11:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Only accidents are probably notable here. And based on what sources? --Finlayson (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply