| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Self-declared Wiki porn policeman Tabercil: Kindly be less hasty in editing other people's contributions in cases where you may not have enough insight into the particular topic to measure what is of relevance in a wider, non-pornographic perspective. Your pornographic expertise may be vast, but Wikipedia should also reflect such areas as historical and sociological interest. Katja Kean is not just a busty blonde, but someone who's career uniquely reflects several important areas of Scandivian culture. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.150.144.188 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Well. Let's take a look at what we have here, shall we?
- Filmography. As per the filmography guidelines for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Porn stars, "Filmographies are to be limited to six films at most" with clear guidelines as when a film can be added above and beyond those numbers. Since there was no context in the original article for why a given film should be listed, I randomly cut down until the number of films present were closer to six. If you feel the filmography should be longer, go ahead... but be sure to defend why with specific reference to the guidelines why that film deserves to be on the list.
- The links to the individual films would be quite alright... on pages that were about those specific films. They do not belong in the article about Katja K - links in her article should be specifically about Katja K and not about projects she did. After all, look at the articles for a number of other actors... you don't see links to the websites promoting specific films for people like Arnold Schwarzenegger or Julia Roberts, do you?
I have nothing against what you are trying to do - Wikipedia is open to all to contribute. It's just that there are guidelines which should be followed. Tabercil 16:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Tabercil, your ability to quote guidelines while wielding your hatchet is unparallelled! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.54.68.245 (talk • contribs) 06:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Yo guys, first of all, Katja Kean can't any longer be considered as merely a porn star, and hence normal porn star guide lines don't apply. Secondly, shouldn't she be listed primarily as "Katja Kean", the name most people know her as? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.215.9.140 (talk • contribs) 08:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- If you take a look at the article, it explains why she's not listed as Katja Keen: "Katja changed her stage name from "Katja Kean" to "Katja K" after a Danish family named Kean complained that they resented their family name being connected to a porn star". And while she may no longer be merely a porn star, I feel that those portions of the article which deal with her porn career will still fall under the Wikipedia:WikiProject Porn stars banner. Tabercil 21:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)