Talk:Kathleen Fogarty

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Extorc in topic Requested move 5 July 2022

Requested move 5 July 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved because editors largely agree that the proposed is the COMMONNAME (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 11:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


Kathleen A. FogartyKathleen Fogarty – only notable person with this name Jax 0677 (talk) 22:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anarchyte (talk) 08:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. No other notable individuals have this name, and Kathleen Fogarty already redirects to this page. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 16:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment. It should be taken into consideration that a subject's middle initial is frequently indicated because that is the preferred form. In this particular case, the legislator's name appears on the ballot as "Kathleen A." and also many Category:Members of the Rhode Island House of Representatives are listed with middle initials, without regard for disambiguation needs. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 19:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Appears to be her WP:COMMONNAME. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. I find it generally annoying that most of the members of the Rhode Island General Assembly are listed with their middle initial, so I support moving this article to get rid of it. Besides, as stated above, it's not like there are any other famous Kathleen Fogartys to be confused with. SusImposter49 (talk) 22:15, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.