Talk:Kater's pendulum

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Chetvorno in topic Good read, but...

It would be nice to have a picture of one. Besselfunctions 21:43, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Done. --ChetvornoTALK 09:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Excellent Explanation, Dates edit

I've only read it quickly, but the explanation of the pendulum is excellent. Only suggestion I have is minor: dates in the "Kater's solution" section. JKeck (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Added date. --ChetvornoTALK 20:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good read, but... edit

In the section "Repsold–Bessel pendulum" the sentence "Here h1, and h2, are the distances of the two pivots from the pendulum's center of gravity, so h1 + h2 = L,..." is a bit confusing to me. The two pivot points are by definition not the real conjugate pivot points (at least not at all locations on the earth), so the sum of their distances from the CG is not the length from any one of the pivot point to its corresponding center of oscillation, i.e. L as defined in the preceding text.

Am I missing something here?

Tony Ho (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I wrote that. You're right, h1 + h2 is not equal to L. I don't know where I got that. I've corrected the text, see if you think it is accurate now. Thank you so much for catching that screwup, Tony Ho. --ChetvornoTALK 13:58, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply