This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Contributor personally connected to the subjectedit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Removing the Template:Connected contributor hat note I added here yesterday, regarding the original creator of this article, Briceno23. While this may well be the subject's husband, Rolando Briceño, the article has been reworked by a number of users, and everything in the article is now supported with references and written in a similar WP:NPOV to that seen in most articles for actors. Wrong to remove the hat note? Well, no one else had added it in the 7 years since article was created, so clearly no one was concerned, the current version shows no evidence for concern, and this section serves as a heads up in the highly unlikely event that the article suddenly swings to something filled with unreferenced personal observations and WP:PUFFERY from that user. Jmg38 (talk) 07:44, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
