Talk:Karma (Anxhela Peristeri song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This is a large GAN from you; I will get on with it today! --K. Peake 07:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• WP:OVERLINK of Anxhela Peristeri in the Eurovision Song Contest part of the infobox
• The semi-final points are not sourced anywhere in the body
• The composed and written/production sentence should be the second of the lead instead
• Remove the mid-tempo part because that is not notable for the lead
• Remove the field of 26 part from the lead since it is not notable here
• "gave positive reviews of" → "gave widely positive reviews of"
• "its nature, Peristeri's vocal delivery, and" → "the nature, Peristeri's vocal delivery and"
• Wikilink Eurovision Song Contest
• Wikilink Kosovo

Background and composition

• "Upon winning the" → "Upon her winning the"
• "have previously been involved" → "had previously been involved"
• Mention in the composition the instrumentation like strings that the re-vamp added per sourcing
• The lyrics need to be ended with a full-stop

Reception

• "received widespread acclaim from" → "was met with widespread acclaim from"
• "Aussievision characterised the song" → "The staff of Aussievision characterised the song"
• "also gave a positive review of the song," → "also positively reviewed the song,"
• "stage presence, and the song's lyrics." → "stage presence and the lyrics."
• "and more in-your-face"." → "and more in-your-face."" per MOS:QUOTE on full sentences
• "and "stronger contender" for a" → "and a "stronger contender" for a"

Promotion and music video

• Remove the comma after Ora News
• Remove pipe on Wiwi Jam
• [28][29][30] shouldn't these be ordered in the same order as the performances?
• The preview source seems to be for one of the revamped version rather than the music video; if so, shouldn't this be in background instead?

At Eurovision Song Contest

Before Rotterdam

• Remove pipe on 59th edition
• Remove wikilink on Festivali i Këngës
• Remove wikilink on Eurovision Song Contest 2021
• Pipe COVID-19 to COVID-19 pandemic

In Rotterdam

• "on 18 and 20 May 2021, respectively, and" → "on 18 and 20 May and"
• "was drawn to perform" → "was set to perform"
• "was the first nation of the 10 to be" → "was one of the 10 nations to be"
• "at 2nd position," → "at second position," per MOS:NUM
• The second semi-final points should be mentioned here, as they are listed in the infobox and lead

Added that part, you're fine with that? Iaof2017 (talk) 10:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

• The glittery and crystal parts are not sourced
• The black LED backdrop is not sourced
• Where is the hand movements for light sourced?
• The grey colour is not sourced
• "with generally positive reviews from critics and viewers." → "with generally positive reviews from critics." per no viewer info being mentioned
• "concluded that it" → "concluded that the performance"

Credits and personnel

• Wikilink Dimitris Kontopoulos

Track listing

• Good

Release history

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks great at 24.2%!!!
• The second citations of ref 8 are in a different language, so change the titles and add the language parameter
• Cite Eurovision Union as publisher instead on ref 16
• Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 21
• Pipe Radio Televizioni Shqiptar to RTSH on ref 34
• Willaim Lee → William Lee on ref 55
• WP:OVERLINK of Telgrafi on ref 56

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 10:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Heyyyy, I will continue with the rest tomorrow. Thank you for this review. Iaof2017 (talk) 20:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

• Iaof2017 Thank you for starting on this, I look forward to seeing the rest of your response later on or tomorrow if I'm working when you go over the remainder! --K. Peake 08:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

• Kyle Peake thank you again, I responded to the remaining comments above. Iaof2017 (talk) 11:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, fabulous work on this! --K. Peake 10:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC)