Talk:Karl Bitar
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Why are there only positive boxes in the ratings box? Bitar is obviously famous and influential, or he would not have been hired by Packer, which will now also make him rich. That is not good enough when you want some info on a new leading light. But maybe he stands for nothing so nothing more can be written. 144.136.177.12 (talk) 07:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Cleanup | March 23, 2016 edit
Hello Wikipedia Editors,
I have just completed cleaning up this page to better organize the information. However, I would still like to note that the page still lacks content, and it still needs more to be completed. Please provide more information (and sources for the information) in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KnowledgeIsGoodForYou (talk • contribs) 23:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)