Talk:Karimganj

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Guideline

edit
  • Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Matter without reference is likely to be deleted. There are separate pages for the city and the district. -- P.K.Niyogi 17:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Proposed merger from Karimganj_district

edit
Oppose. One is for the city, one is for the district. Have you brought this up at WP:INDIST? There's an entire project for districts that will become defunct if this becomes the standard. Please explain your motivations at our Talk Page. Also, when signing comments please write four "~" symbols. Thanks.

Cheers,

PhnomPencil (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karimganj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply