Talk:Karanvir Bohra/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Digvijay411 (talk · contribs) 00:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I do feel it is a good article according to the good article criteria. Digvijay411

Involved editors are not to perform GA reviews, especially when you are recently and currently involved in substantial editorial disputes over the content. DMacks (talk) 04:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, the reviewer seems to have constantly edited the article prior to the GA nomination. —Vensatry _(ping) 19:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Not GA at this time

Unfortunately, marking as not GA at this time, due to recent substantial editorial disputes over the content as noted, above. — Cirt (talk) 08:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)