This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Clearly the section entitled "Mother of South Indian Music" has real issues vis-a-vis neutrality. There is no historical evidence given for this extraordinary claim, so it ought to be removed unless the authors can provide the kind of strong evidence that would merit it being kept in. Krishnamurthi (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that was obviously POV and mentioned no sources, so I've removed it entirely. The article as a whole has tonal problems and needs better referencing, but I lack the time and expertise to rewrite it myself so I'm tagging it in the hope that others will be able to improve it. --RL0919 (talk) 18:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
.jpg){kind=small}
