Talk:Karachi Circular Railway

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Abdulrahimb in topic Funding Figures

At this stage this is a very draft atricle.Peple with more authentic knowledge pl. contribute....Pratheepps 13:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Map of the KCR edit

Anyone with suggestions on the correctness of the rout plan/stations/phase designations please suggest it here. I can revise and upload a new map..Pratheepps 13:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/karachicircularrailw/
    Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karachi Circular Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Funding Figures edit

The opening paragraph notes Rs. 10.5 billion in funding from the federal government in 2020 (I searched on Google and RailJournal article notes this figure, though its not cited in the parapgraph). The later section on this Wikipedia articel about funding cites 105 billion in 2020 from the federal government with a citation from Pakistan Tribune, however, the article referenced actually notes "Rs 1,500 million" (Rs 1.5 billion). So we have three figures: 10.5 billion, 105 billion with a citation, and the citation itself which says 1.5 billion. Can anyone untangle this? Is this a matter of numerical convention leading to confusion with different online sources?

Abdulrahimb (talk) 07:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply