Talk:Kansas State Wildcats men's basketball

Image copyright problem with Image:KSUWildcats logo.png edit

The image Image:KSUWildcats logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Elite 8's, Sweet 16's edit

The NCAA officially does not count opening round games as elite 8's or sweet 16's in it's record books. See here for an example [1]. On page 7 there is a table of "Most Appearances in the Sweet 16", which states Sweet 16 Records begin in 1975, the first year that all teams in the tournament would be required to win at least one game to advance to the Sweet 16. Notice as well that even though KSU has 16 Sweet 16's listed on this page, they aren't listed in the table, even though the 25th ranked team only has 8 appearances. I think at the very least we should put a footnote clarifying things. Ryan2845 (talk) 13:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree footnotes are necessary for the Sweet 16 in 1951 and the Elite 8 in 1948 because those were opening round games. For all the other years, KSU received a bye while other teams were playing, meaning these were not in fact opening round games. I do not think those claims require an asterisk. I am changing accordingly. Further discussion may be warranted on this point. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 17:23, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Also, I don't actually see this note on any other team's pages. It doesn't appear to be standard. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 17:30, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Works for me as far as the byes go. When I added it here I checked a few other pages and didn't see any other teams claiming first round games as elite 8's and so on, so I added the footnotes here. Maybe those years should only be listed under "appearances"? Which seems to be what other pages do Ryan2845 (talk) 18:30, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
No other site has footnotes for opening round appearance (although perhaps they all should). Here were just a few I noticed that claim appearances without any qualifying notes: Arizona Wildcats men's basketball, Arkansas Razorbacks men's basketball, Colorado Buffaloes men's basketball, Illinois Fighting Illini men's basketball, Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball... -Kgwo1972 (talk) 18:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Doesn't surprise me, since I'm the one who added it and I already said I didn't see any on the other pages I looked at. I think it's worth noting across the board, i'll bring it up on the college basketball project talk page here in a bit. Although it appears the NCAA record books do not count the bye's as sweet 16 either, so in my opinion those should probably have the note as well. Ryan2845 (talk) 21:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've laid out my thoughts here, feel free to respond Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College Basketball#Tournament appearance designations in infobox. I may have inadvertently singled out the KSU page since I tend to mostly look at KU's rivals, but I do feel that this could be made a standard across the board.

Bramlage Coliseum edit

What's the deal with all the different names? Evil saltine (talk) 20:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

They're playing their cross-state rival tomorrow. I've requested protection at WP:RFPP.--Cube lurker (talk) 20:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Second Round Appearances edit

I'm deleting the "second round" appearances section from the infobox. In my opinion, it's confusing and unnecessary. For example, does the "second round" equal the "Final Four" in 1948, since there were only eight teams invited to the tournament? Is it only the round of 32 starting in 1985? Kansas State's history in the tournament is laid out clearly in the article, and I think this "second round" section in the infobox is frankly confusing. Many infoboxes contain only "Final Fours" and total appearances, so I see no need to keep it on this page. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 16:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Record against big 12 teams edit

The KSU media guide is fairly unreliable as a source for this. I've changed the record against KU back to what the KU media guide lists for now at least. In their 2007-08 media guide they listed the series as 173-89 and then in the 2008-09 media guide the listed it as 173-90, so they didn't even add KU's win in 08 to the total. Ryan2845 (talk) 19:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think I reverted it again before I saw this message. (I act quickly!) I'd love to look into this further, since I love historical sports research, but I maintain the default is to rely on the accuracy of the KSU record book for the time being. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 19:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Also, I noted the difference on the chart on the Sunflower Showdown page, which already notes the difference in baseball and football standings. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 19:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I don't think it makes sense on the sunflower showdown page. This one is the result of easily proven poor bookkeeping on KSU side, the others are due to disputed forfeits. Ryan2845 (talk) 20:04, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I honestly don't know if it's poor bookkeeping. They may have done historical research themselves between those seasons that changed their totals. I just don't know... I've had my issues with the KSU media guides, and I've exchanged e-mails with the KSU SID and AD about very basic corrections that need to be made. However, I've found that sometimes it turns out that they do know what they're doing. And I think the default should be to at least acknowledge the KSU record book. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 20:12, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
That being said, I don't think this difference rises to the level of needing to be mentioned in the text on the Sunflower Showdown page. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 20:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, i've gone through this before with another editor so i'm 100% sure the KSU books are wrong. The easy way to prove is take the 08-09 record book I linked above (which lists KU with 173 wins on one page) and then goto the all time game by game history and count up the KU wins listed there and you'll get 175, not 173, so the KSU guide doesn't even agree with itself. An easy way to get a quick count is to paste the series history into a text editor with line numbering and remove all the ksu or opponent wins and the last line number is that teams number of wins. An easy method if you want to check the other big 12 numbers without counting by hand. Ryan2845 (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
OK. I'll check that out. Thanks. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
The issue wasn't nearly so straightforward. Going game-by-game through the KSU record book gives a series record of 91-179. The difference was a game on March 6, 1974, which both teams showed as a win. KU apparently won that game, so the series is in fact 180-90 in favor of KU. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 20:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Uniforms in infobox edit

I suggest the grey replace the black as the alternate uniform, since the team wears grey much more often than black as an alternate color. The home uniform should be white, the away uniform color should stay purple. Agree? Topgun530 (talk) 18:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kansas State Wildcats men's basketball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kansas State Wildcats men's basketball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply