This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Kannikadass William Antony is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Katejannet Saying "evil people who are against Kannikadass Anthony William are spreading fake news linking paid local articles" is a serious accusation which you should not make without very good evidence(and without WP:OUTING people). The given source describing the leave of absence claims health reasons, not misconduct, were the reason for the LOA. I've left off any reason for the LOA for now. 331dot (talk) 15:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Do you think WP:SUSPECT applies here? Should we remove the allegations pending a final decision? PhilKnight (talk) 18:59, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
