Talk:Kangding County

Latest comment: 14 years ago by John Hill in topic Proposed merger with Kangding

Proposed merger with Kangding

edit

I totally agree with the proposed merger - I look forward to seeing the combined article when completed. Thank you for suggesting it. Sincerely, John Hill (talk) 10:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I dont think it is a relevant proposal, as the county and the city are 2 different subjects. I propose not merging. Status Quo. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. I also recommend to keep them separate: since the city has 100,000 people, there will be more information to fill the separate city article. In the USA, a city of even 10,000 typically has enough points of interest to fill a short article. -Wikid77 (talk) 22:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Strong oppose The county and town are quite seperate. It would be like merging the New York City article into the New York State article. Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sometimes one has to eat humble pie. Dr. Blofeld recently asked why I was in favour of the proposed merger and, on further reflection, I have reversed my opinion above that the articles should be merged and now am Strongly opposed. John Hill (talk) 22:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply