Talk:Kandalanu
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Ichthyovenator in topic What does this mean?
 | Kandalanu has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 21, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources edit
The notes given make incomprehensible references to sources (e.g. 'ZA'). Clean-up please from someone?--Smerus (talk) 10:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
What does this mean? edit
"Examples as Tiglath-Pileser III (reigning over Babylon as "Pulu") and his son Shalmaneser V (reigning over Babylon as "Ululayu") are not based on authentic and official evidence"
I don't understand what the article is saying, and to the extent that I do understand, it seems to contradict my previous understanding which is, indeed, that Tiglath-Pileser III reigned over Babylon as "Pulu" and Shalmaneser V did so as "Ululayu." If that's not true, why is that a thing people say? The article is elliptical and confusing. john k (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Although they are often said to have been, there is no contemporary hard evidence that "Pulu" and "Ululayu" were used as regnal names. Ichthyovenator (talk) 12:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)