Talk:Kampoeng Rawa

GA Review

Article promoted 21:58, 22 July 2014

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kampoeng Rawa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: TLSuda (talk · contribs) 02:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Greetings! I'm taking this GA review. I will do my first read-through and my initial review should be posted in the morning. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 02:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Thanks, looking forward to it. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Initial review In the lead the sentence starting "Facilities include..." seems like a run on. My opinion is that it should end after "dock" and start a new sentence with "during" The "and" makes it not a run-on, but split. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Add a period at the end of the caption of the image under the Location and facilities section. And add a period ad the end of the caption in the first image. Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC) What direction (NESW) can visitors have a view of the mountains? South. Added. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC) "A variety of activities are available onsite, including ATVs, flying fox, jet skis, and fishing." 3/4 of those are not activities but are objects. you might could add the words "areas for" after including? Went with "and facilities". — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Is there any update to the status of the situation with not having permission from the government? Nothing yet, sadly. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC) That is all I have at the moment, and the article looks good except for that. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Final review GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article. Is it reasonably well written? A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: Is it factually accurate and verifiable? A. Has an appropriate reference section: B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: C. No original research: Is it broad in its coverage? A. Major aspects: B. Focused: Is it neutral? Fair representation without bias: Is it stable? No edit wars, etc: Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Overall: Pass or Fail: Everything looks good! I'm happy to promote this article to GA status. Keep up the high quality when adding about what happens with the permission controversy when that is settled. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kampung Rawa, from a distance 2014-06-20 (02).jpg to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Kampung Rawa, from a distance 2014-06-20 (02).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 30, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-08-30. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Picture of the day

Kampoeng Rawa is a tourist attraction in Ambarawa, Central Java, located within the green belt around Lake Rawa Pening. Opened in August 2012, it is owned and operated by twelve groups of farmers and fishermen who were funded by the Artha Prima Credit Union. It is intended to improve the welfare of local farmers and fishermen while promoting an understanding of the lake's ecology. Facilities include a floating restaurant, pendopo, crafts centre, fishing area, and docks. It has been challenged for its lack of permission to build in the green belt and the possible ecological impact.Photograph: Chris Woodrich