Talk:Kampala Convention

Possible editing

Hello, I am considering editing this article as part of my Human Development course at Rice University. This topic is very recent, especially relevant in current international discourse, but not many efforts have been made to provide a good account of this on Wikipedia. For an expanded view of my editing intentions and list of possible references, visit my user page. Thanks! Epant25 (talk) 03:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Editing proposal

Hello, I am strongly considering editing this page— and have detailed a section by section proposal outline of possible editing, found here. . Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions about the proposal, project, or anything else I may have left out. Thanks! Epant25 (talk) 03:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Began editing

Hello all, I have added preliminary basic relevant facts— marking the start of my editing. I will continue to expand on these, and post them periodically to the mainspace. In particular, the summaries will be greatly expanded on here. Please feel free to provide any feedback on these minute edits, and please refer to my article user page for information on the outline of planned work. Thanks! Epant25 (talk) 00:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hi Esteban,

I think you have done a great job with this article so far! The content is clearly written, concise, and very readable, with great sourcing, neutrality, and comprehensiveness. It is clear to me that you took a very bare bones article and have made it into a respectable, high-quality one that goes above and beyond in its coverage of this topic.

The changes I would suggest you make are improving the lead section so that it reflects and covers all of the sub-topics presented in the article, adding a bit to the “impact” section as I think it may be the most important section of all of them (especially with regards to PJHC perspectives), adding an image, and adding more links/explanations to some of the key terms you mention in the article. Improving the lead would allow readers to get a better picture/summary of the article before (or instead of) reading the entire thing, expanding the “impact” section would make your work have a deeper reach, and adding an image and some better links to key terms can help with accessibility and making the content easier to understand for any reader.

Overall, I think you’ve done a great job and your work has vastly improved this article! Keep it up!

Nicolekoonce (talk) 23:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)