Talk:Kaleidoscope Dream
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaleidoscope Dream article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Kaleidoscope Dream has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kaleidoscope Dream/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bruce Campbell (talk · contribs) 00:57, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Reviewer here. Bruce Campbell (talk) 00:57, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Literally the only things I could nitpick:
- "In 2011, Miguel collaborated with rapper Wale on the latter's single "Lotus Flower Bomb", which attained extended airplay on urban radio into 2012." - explain directly what this has to do with the background. Should be mentioned that it was his breakout single/that it was a top 40 single and secured him the interest of a wider audience, etc.
- Prince, Marvin Gaye, Frank Ocean etc are wikilinked multiple times. Some publications are too, like Pitchfork Media. (yeah I know how repetitive of an issue it is )
- I dunno... wikilink Rock-paper-scissors?
- If the album was released in Canada why doesn't it have a charting position?
So yeah, this definitely fulfills the GA criteria... I just don't like passing things without at least attempting to comment on what could be improved even if there's very little. Bruce Campbell (talk) 02:17, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Done; either it charted at too low of a position in Canada to be reported by Billboard and the like, or a lot of Canadians are missing out on good music. Dan56 (talk) 02:42, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Passed. Bruce Campbell (talk) 03:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Supposed deluxe version
editThis source from JPC (retailer) does not verify what you are using the Amazon.com source to support. Your source does not say anything about it being a German, Swiss, or Austrian release. All it says is "Kaleidoscope Dream (Deluxe Version)" in a store that's translated in German. Using it to support what you added is original research, meaning that it does not directly/explicitly support what it's supposedly citing. It also contradicts the source that is more reliable for this information: a major German retailer. Dan56 (talk) 01:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
You know what this is pointless. I know for a fact that the album is being re-released with the tracklist. Just watch and see. So damn stubborn. Amazon.de works independently from Amazon.com...
This from JPC.de. They are also going to sell the re-release with the new tracklist. http://www.jpc.de/jpcng/poprock/detail/-/art/Miguel-Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/hnum/3586968
Same goes for this Swiss retailer. http://www.buch.ch/shop/home/artikeldetails/kaleidoscope_dream_deluxe_version/miguel/EAN0888837318228/ID35055523.html;jsessionid=C2735280E2C542EE0DDCB497D3BE1A5B.tc1p
- Neither link you provided shows a track listing. Dan56 (talk) 01:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
http://www.cd-lexikon.de/album_miguel-kaleidoscope-dream.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.71.165.253 (talk) 15:47, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- ???. I'm seeing the original release's 11-track listing. Dan56 (talk) 01:05, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
You are f**ing annoying. http://www.jpc.de/jpcng/poprock/detail/-/art/Miguel-Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/hnum/3586968
IT IS RIGHT THERE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.71.165.253 (talk) 08:53, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- That's not what you originally showed. Calm urself. Dan56 (talk) 03:05, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- BTW, your most recent link is erroneous: track number 10 "We've Only Just Begun" is merely just a sample used in the preceding song "How Many Drinks?" ([1]); same for "Time Of The Season" being sampled on "Don't Look Back", and "I Got The" on "Kaleidoscope Dream" (as credited in the liner notes). Dan56 (talk) 03:14, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Let me interfere here, the album is indeed being re-released.
Malcolmo (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Kaleidoscope Dream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130701024932/http://www.sonymusic.de/Miguel/Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/P/2727266 to http://www.sonymusic.de/Miguel/Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/P/2727266
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://hmv.com/hmvweb/displayProductDetails.do?ctx=280;0;-1;-1;-1&sku=278200
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130701024932/http://www.sonymusic.de/Miguel/Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/P/2727266 to http://www.sonymusic.de/Miguel/Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/P/2727266
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130627213003/http://www.sonymusic.at/Miguel/Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/P/2727266 to http://www.sonymusic.at/Miguel/Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/P/2727266
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130628071003/http://www.sonymusic.ch/Miguel/Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/P/2727266 to http://www.sonymusic.ch/Miguel/Kaleidoscope-Dream-Deluxe-Version/P/2727266
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)