Talk:Kajol

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Nicholas Michael Halim in topic Sections
Good articleKajol has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 2, 2012Good article nomineeListed

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Early sources from the archives edit

Sections edit

As I said, the idea that she had only two years of what is called here "widespread success" (this should change too) is unimaginably funny. I personally think that from 1999-2001 she was still successful and a big star even if she had flops (like any actor). But anyway 1995 was a big year for her.

I suggest one of the following:

  • Debut and rise to prominence (1992–1996)
  • Widespread success (1997–2001)
  • Comeback and intermittent work (2006–2012)
  • Dilwale and return to Tamil cinema (2015–2019)
  • Tanhaji and Netflix debut (2020–present)

or:

  • Debut and rise to prominence (1992–1994)
  • Widespread success (1995–1998)
  • Comeback and intermittent work (2006–2012)
  • Dilwale and return to Tamil cinema (2015–2019)
  • Tanhaji and Netflix debut (2020–present)

Generally, if we change "Widespread success" to "mainstream success" or "established actress". ShahidTalk2me 10:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The first one. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Don't you think DDLJ is part of her widespread success and not part of her breakthrough? ShahidTalk2me 14:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have been thinking about it; you are right. The second one is better. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply