Untitled edit

kairouan is not a holy city

You should visit it before giving your opinion . Amy winhouse (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

NPOV edit

I cannot really see how calling it a holy city isn't POV; saying that it is regarded as holy by Muslims is NPOV. What is the objection to the latter? --Phronima 17:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi:) Their is nothing wrong with the latter except that it is an unnecessary circumlocation. i would say holy city is a perfectly acceptable NPOV term IMO. It simply describes a class of cities, like beach resorts, administrative centres, pilgimage centres, etc. It is not making any judgement about the validity of the religion in question. Jerusalem, Mecca, Varanasi etc, etc, are holy cities in the sense that that is their role in the world. What sort of city is Oxford? It is a university city. What sort of city is Varanasi? It is a holy city. Maybe all Hindus are deluded but that is irrelevant. Jameswilson 23:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Armoirie kairouan.jpg edit

 

Image:Armoirie kairouan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Holy city edit

The city is not universally considered a holy city by Muslims the way Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem are. Certainly there are local traditions about the city, which developed out of the city's unique history, and they should be mentioned. But it is rather exaggerating to phrase the lead the way Chesdovi did.VR talk 00:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I accept that there are many Muslims like yourself who are entitled to their own views on matters such as this, but The Middle East and North Africa 2003, published by Routledge in 2003, states unequivocally that it is a holy city for Muslims and the Hutchinson Encyclopedia 1996 Edition states very clearly that Kairouan "ranks after Mecca and Medina as a place of Muslim pilgrimage." I am only quoting the reliable sources we have on this, not your own takes on the matter. Chesdovi (talk) 00:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Nor did I exclude those sources, or delete them. I only included them in an NPOV manner. The reason being that there are a ton of books and literature (all RS) on Islam that don't claim Kairouan has a holy city. Of course, there are some, as you pointed out above, that do. So we include them in a neutral manner.VR talk 13:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
The fact that other books don't mention this city as holy is not a reason to exclue this word. If a book states that "Kairouan is not a holy city", then you have something to rely on. Until then, you cannot remove this important infomation. Where is it implied that the holy status of this city is the same as that of Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem? There is no source that says it: "attracted a large number of Muslims from various parts of the world, next only to Mecca and Medina." Chesdovi (talk) 00:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Founded by Tunisian Nomads or Arabs? edit

I am not knowledgeable about this city's history, but the intro paragraph looks a bit garbled and disagrees with the information in the History section. So which sources say it was founded by nomads? The external links all seem to say Arabs, except possibly the first. (Google did not have an interior view even after I changed it to English.)

-Sam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.215.23.139 (talk) 03:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kairouan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Etymology edit

The name القيروان al-Qayruwan is used once in the Arabic-language Gospel of Mark to refer to Cyrene, Libya, normally rendered as قوريني Qurini in Arabic. --Z 14:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply