Talk:Kafr Ein
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Mills, E., ed. (1932)-data, is it there?
editI cannot find it here; but there are several names in the Ramallah-section which I do not recognise....Kafr Ein might be one of them. Huldra (talk) 23:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Can you identify 'In Kafr that is listed there? On maps I only see "Kafr Ein" or "Kafr 'Ein" though.
Another factoid is that it does not appear in the lists of villages in each sub-district which appeared in the Gazette every time the boundaries were changed. This suggests it was considered part of a nearby village, such as Qawarat Bani Zeid.On the other hand, the 20K cadastral map (16-16) shows a substantial built-up area and village lands for it. Zerotalk 00:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)- Correction: it appears in the Gazette lists 1940–1945.
- In the 1931 list there is In Kafr but not Kafr Ein while in the 1945 list there is Kafr Ein but not In Kafr. Hmmmmm... 00:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- ...and In Kafr has 494 inhabitants...pretty much half-way between Kafr Ein`s 1922 number (=376) and 1945 number (=550).....I think we have a winner! Thanks.. Huldra (talk) 20:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Probably, but it is hard to prove. I see "Kefr Ain" in a 1924 village list. I don't see any other mention of "In Kafr". On the way I noticed a passage about the women of "Kefr Ain" in Wilson's "Village Life", pp78–79, probably worth inclusion. Zerotalk 23:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I take the chance on it being this place: I cannot see what else it could be. As for Wilson, 1906, pp. 78-79; I believe he refers to females of the Barghouti-family (of which there undoubtedly also were some in Kafr Ein), but not about the women of the village generally. Btw, he writes much the same as Stuart Macalister, 1905, p. 255: I wonder if he more or less copied him? Huldra (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Probably, but it is hard to prove. I see "Kefr Ain" in a 1924 village list. I don't see any other mention of "In Kafr". On the way I noticed a passage about the women of "Kefr Ain" in Wilson's "Village Life", pp78–79, probably worth inclusion. Zerotalk 23:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- ...and In Kafr has 494 inhabitants...pretty much half-way between Kafr Ein`s 1922 number (=376) and 1945 number (=550).....I think we have a winner! Thanks.. Huldra (talk) 20:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kafr Ein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101210081942/http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1487.pdf to http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1487.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)