Talk:Kabul City Center/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by WPSamson in topic Passing

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 07:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


Happy to review the article.

Assessment edit

Summary edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Lead section and infobox, History
  • Unlink hotel (common word).
  Done
  • Ref 5 (Jawad) is not needed in the lead section, as the information it cites is not controversial.
  Done
  Done

Features edit

  • Unlink women (common word).
  Done
  • The last paragraph provides too much detail about something that happened in 2010. It needs to be reduced in size.
Reception
  • Unlink luxurious, expensive, factories, unemployed (all common words).
  Done
  • Consider amending the title, as ‘Reception’ could also mean the entrance to the building. (I would change it to 'Public reception'.)
  Done
References
  Done
  • A (subscription required) template is needed for Ref 9 (New York Times).
  Done
  • Ref 10 (Krishnamurthy) does not appear to verify the text.
  Done I had added quote from the sources into references quote parameter for better verifiability.
  • US $ 5050 per month - Ref 11 (Reuters) gives a rental, but it is 13 years out of date. Is there a more up-to-date number available?
  Removed I not able to find the latest rental price for the shop in this mall beyond 2008, even no information from unreliable sources are available.

External links edit

On hold edit

Hello WPSamson, I'm placing this interesting article on hold until 18 September to allow time for the above issues to be addressed. Please ping me if you need to. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Passing edit

As both of the remaining points are what I would do myself, and are not particularly needed for GA, i can pass the article. Great work! Amitchell125 (talk) 16:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks @Amitchell125: WPSamson (talk) 06:31, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply