Talk:KVDO-TV/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Some Dude From North Carolina in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Infobox looks good.
  • Excellent lead (well-sourced and of reasonable length)!

History of channel 3 in Salem edit

  • Remove the comma after "Salem in 1952".
  • "Telecasters's" → "Telecasters'"
  • I consider "Salem Telecasters" a singular noun per MOS:POSS, so I left this as is.
  • No other issues (also well-sourced).

KVDO-TV as a commercial independent edit

  • "telecasting February" → "telecasting on February"
  • "first ever" → "first-ever"
  • "with quality" → "with the quality"
  • Remove the comma after "$410,000".

Sale to OEPBS edit

  • "by Oregon Educational" → "by the Oregon Educational"
  • Remove the comma after "lead by December".
  • Add a comma after "two newscasts"
  • "prime time" → "primetime" or "prime-time"

Public KVDO edit

  • "including of the" → "including the"
  • "of channel 16, while" → "for channel 16 while"
  • "Deschutes County" → "Deschutes County's"
  • That hatnote at the bottom seems out of place. Move it somewhere else, or a #See_also section can be made.

References edit

  • Try archiving sources (especially those from Newspapers.com, which will disappear if the title changes).

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·