Talk:KMFA

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Radio Stations

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas / Austin Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Austin (assessed as Low-importance).

Other definitions

I don't mean to be rude, but the Urban Dictionary has an alternate definition for this entry: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=kmfa Perhaps you could include it. MAC 20:50, September 4, 2006 (UTC)

Article length and copyvio

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Resolved

While the current May29th KMFA article is better than the stub that existed prior to May 15th 2008. As the tag says... it's a bit wordy for Wikipedia. Also... the entire article is a copy of "About Us" page from KMFA's own web site. So... these are questions to Rich, Julian88Tex, and anyone else who works for KMFA:

Does KMFA release their descriptive copy into the public domain? The KMFA About Us page explicitly states that all of the text currently being used is "© 2006 kmfa. All rights reserved"... Meaning, that I have have a mind to revert the article to the stub that it was for copyright infringement.
Also... if we are going to the effort of asking KMFA to release the copyright on their "About" text, then we might as well ask them to release the logo into a GFDL or a CC-by license with a declaration of consent.

So really... I like KMFA. There are few things better than waking up, realizing that it is Sunday morning, and then listening to Ancient Voices with Sara Hessel. However copyright violations are uncool. Thoughts? Comments? Azoreg (talk) 23:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I emailed KMFA... and they asked me to remove the offending material:

Please go ahead and remove the copyrighted material from KMFA's

Wikipedia entry. Thank you!

Judy Watts <jwatts@kmfa.org>

Development Associate | Webmaster

Classical 89.5

512.476.5632

www.kmfa.org

So, I removed most all of the edits since from today back to May 15th 2008 Azoreg (talk) 22:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic