Talk:KGET-TV

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Article name edit

I have moved this article from KGET to KGET-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here: [1] the call letters for this station are in fact KGET-TV. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 09:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

History edit

Soures say that the station was originally KJTV and affiliated with ABC when it first signed on on November 8, 1959...[2] [3] Ranma9617 04:41, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I changed the sign-on date to 11-8-59, and McSittel's TV Guide page does INDEED show KGET's former calls and affiliation, although I'm not going to rule out a former CBS affiliation yet. I'll have to look at the KERO and KBAK pages as well to get the whole story. Gatorman 06:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Additionally, this source says the KBAK took ABC in the early to mid 1970's. It suggests that KJTV/KPWR possibly did carry CBS from that point until becoming the present NBC affiliate KGET(I don't know the approximate date when KERO flipped from NBC to CBS.), but I've yet to find further sources(online or off)to further back this up. If only mcsittel.com had a CenCal(Bakersfield/Fresno)TV Guide channel listing from that era(with channel 17 as KPWR)...Ranma9617 20:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
KPWR was most definitely a CBS affiliate at one time. It switched to the KGET call letters shortly before it traded networks with KERO (which was an NBC affiliate) in 1984. - Chadbryant 01:40, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
So this means that Bakersfield is the only market to have 2 stations that had been an affiliate of all "Big 3" networks, right?

donotsayno 04:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

So that iformation can be corrected, the General Managers name for KGET TV-17 is spelled Teri Riley.

WP is not a directory edit

It would be best not to treat WP articles as invitations to turn them into lists of names or, in the case of radio and television, into lists of programs. See Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

not a big deal edit

Your making a big deal out of nothing. JoeCool950 (talk) 05:33, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KGET-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KGET-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply