Talk:K-44 (Kansas highway)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by CycloneIsaac in topic GA Review
 | K-44 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:K-44 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 20:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this.—– 20:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- "In 2013, KDOT measured traffic counts in terms of average annual daily traffic (AADT) on K-44 ranging from a high of 729 vehicles in Anthony to a low of 313 vehicles in western Sumner County." Comma between "Anthony" and "to"?
- I don't think so. Here's how I judge whether or not a comma is needed in these situations: if a comma would make sense without the prepositional phrases, then I add it. However, in this case without the prepositional phrases it would read "ranging from a high, to a low", which doesn't read right. TCN7JM 00:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Looks good!—– 23:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Replied. TCN7JM 00:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, there's nothing else significant, so I'm passing this article.—– 00:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)