This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:29, May 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Kōhaku maku is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
The closest I could find was ja:紅白, which actually has a picture of a kōhakumaku that might better illustrate this article. ···日本穣? · TalktoNihonjoe 05:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
That's fine; I wanted to at least have a free-graphic available if nothing else was. User:Zscout370(Return Fire) 05:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Note that the article I mentioned is not specifically about kōhakumaku, but rather about kōhaku (the combination of the colors). Kōhakumaku are mentioned in the article, but are not the main focus of the article. Therefore it may be best to not interwiki link the two. ···日本穣? · TalktoNihonjoe 06:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'll actually move this article, since I am begining to see your point. I will move it to kōhaku. User:Zscout370(Return Fire) 04:38, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
It's still a little bit off in the description since kōhaku is just the combination of colors, not necessarily a banner or anything like a banner. ···日本穣? · TalktoNihonjoe 05:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply