Talk:Juravenator

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The taxon box says it's a coelurid, but the text says it's a close relative of Sinosauropteryx, a compsognathid. Well, which is it?

Most other entries use Compsognathinae, as a subfamily of Coeluridae. Some scientists place compsognathines in their own family, Compsognathidae. Juravenator, according to the artciles I've read, is a compsognathine (compsognathidif used as a seperate family). The actual paper describing it won't come out until next week, so this might change.Dinoguy2 02:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's a basal coelurosaurian ;o)--MWAK 07:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

It should be noted that one guy (I think it was Darren Naish) now believes this animal to be a tiny neotenic carnosaur. 69.181.200.82 (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

There are no feathers on Juravenator? edit

Currently, there is a second citation in the page. I click on the citation and there is an image of the feathers on the tail of Juravenator. If it states there are feathers on Juravenator, then how come I don’t see any?

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Juravenator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060316190310/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/bigphotos/5733093.html to http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/bigphotos/5733093.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic