Talk:Junk (novel)

Fair use rationale for Image:MelvinBurgess Junk.jpg

Resolved

Image:MelvinBurgess Junk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Awards

first of multiple new sections in one session

The Carnegie and Guardian achievements are notable enough to be covered in the lead section, not buried. Done.

Probably this book also reached at least one of the shortlists that are usually covered in books articles, but none was yet mentioned here, so I deleted the Awards section. -P64

Simultaneous publication

one of multiple new sections

Does anyone know how to learn whether this novel was "co-published" in UK and US. "Simultaneous" publication isn't the same, and it's my inference from the first edition 14 Nov 1996 (by previous editors) and the 1996 US publication year. -P64 2012-07-11

Now I am uncertain about the US publication year, perhaps a mistake by one library. The U.S. Library of Congress catalog record gives publication date 1998 and Classification "PZ7.B9166 Sm 1997". I don't understand the internal discrepancy --not simply library receipt of a copy during calendar year 1997, i suppose, for there would be many such discrepancies in that case. I don't know whether its Edition "1st American ed." may be mistaken --hope not, having relied on that field so heavily elsewhere.

For now both LCC records are in the article as formal references *and* the lead continues to say simultaneous --my work last fortnight. --P64 (talk) 16:09, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

More catalog data for early US editions.

• Junk in libraries (WorldCat catalog) ISBN 0140380191 --that is, 1997 Penguin edition as Junk --if true, Smack is not the only US title
• Smack in libraries (WorldCat catalog) ISBN 080505801X --that is, 1998 Holt edition as Smack, called 1st American ed.

"After running away from their troubled homes, two English teenagers move in with a group of squatters in the port city of Bristol and try to find ways to support their growing addiction to heroin."

(The article now links twice --infobox, Extlink-- to one World record for the UK edition and does not mention either of these. It also links to LCCatalog records for UK and US editions. I consider that the more reliable of WP:RELIABLE SOURCEs and I would name its first US publisher in the article now, but the LC server is down or overloaded. I have copied its summary:

"Tells, in the voices of many individuals, of two fourteen-year-old runaways in Bristol, England, who find a home with anarchists and get involved in vandalism, shoplifting, and prostitution to support their growing addiction to heroin."

--P64 (talk) 14:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Trainspotting

last of three new sections in one session

Our biography Melvin Burgess is a mere Stub but it mentions the Trainspotting context of his most famous work in the lead paragraph. Almost certainly that should be covered here. Beside this note, all I have done is add "See also" both book and film. --P64 (talk) 17:13, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Junk (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130106194131/http://www.carnegiegreenaway.org.uk/livingarchive/title.php?id=62 to http://www.carnegiegreenaway.org.uk/livingarchive/title.php?id=62
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161027022418/http://www.carnegiegreenaway.org.uk/celebration/top_tens.php?action=list to http://www.carnegiegreenaway.org.uk/celebration/top_tens.php?action=list
• Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://yearbook.literacyresearchassociation.org/57th_Yearbook/Bickerstaff.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)