Talk:Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

it's unclear who the JOBS act rules apply to edit

It's unclear to me as I read this article who the JOBS act crowd funding rules apply to. Do these rules apply to existing crowd funding platforms like Kickstarter and Indie GoGo, such that an individual or small business can no longer use them to raise money for a project without complying with these rules? Or do these rules create a new, mutually exclusive system of crowd funding that is separate from things like Kickstarter, such that Kickstarter type projects can go on as before? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.187.6.106 (talk) 21:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

use of Twitter and modern Internet platforms edit

Who will be allowed to use these technologies, and for what? (97.178.134.123 (talk) 00:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC))Reply

Some[who?] criticized the House version of the bill as "gutting regulations designed to safeguard investors", edit

I am not experienced with editing, but among the "who?" that have criticized this bill are Jack E Hernstein, the president of the NASAA (NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION, INC.). His letter to the Senate regarding his criticisms can be found here: http://www.nasaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/NASAA-Letter-to-Senate-Leadership-on-H.R.-3606-FINAL-3-12-2012.pdf

Can someone experienced with editing, please post this citation? Thank you. 69.42.41.244 (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC)HistoryLunaticReply

Holders in Street Name edit

The sentence citing to the Jim Hamilton blog related to "holders in street name" is misleading as currently written. Shares of private companies are not frequently held in street name because private companies as a practice keep records for their capitalization tables in order to keep control over voting as well as to prevent triggering the 500 shareholder limit. There's nothing in the cited source confirming that it is "common" for private companies to have more than 500 shareholders as a result of being under-counted through holders in street name. In addition, the SEC has the power at any time to count beneficial owners individually and manually trigger the 500-shareholder limit. Therefore, this should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JayNaz (talkcontribs) 02:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Updating article edit

Much of the article is devoted to earlier versions of the bill. These are now moot since the law has been passed. I hope to update the article with more current commentary.--Nowa (talk) 18:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

For sure, thanks! I'll try to pitch in. - Wikidemon (talk) 22:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Legislative History edit

The first two paragraphs of the Legislative History section elide the distinction between the JOBS Act as a whole, which is the topic of the entry, and its crowdfunding provision (Title III), which is one of five sections of the legislation, each of which has a different legislative history. This is problematic because, for example, the history and lobbying efforts behind Title II, which lifts the ban on general solicitation for certain unregistered securities, also impacted the passage of the JOBS Act [1]. Regarding Title III, the text misses some key points that I just raised in the Talk section of the Crowd funding entry. Among these are:

  • (Omission) The crowdfunding legislation in the JOBS Act was not based on the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act (H.R.2930, McHenry, R-NC), which was the first crowdfunding exemption bill. The original version of the JOBS Act included H.R.2930, but the Senate swapped it out for different language that more closely resembled a later bill, the CROWDFUND Act (S.1970, Merkley, D-OR). It is this version that was subsequently passed by the house and signed into law. See Steven Bradford, Promise Unfulfilled, Securities Regulation Law Journal [2], page 5.
  • (Omission) Rep. McHenry cites the inspiration for H.R.2930 as the BuyaBeerCompany.com campaign, which launched in Nov 2009 to gather pledges for the purchase of the Pabst Brewing Company. See House Oversight Committee hearing, June 26, 2012, "The JOBS Act in Action" [3], McHenry comments starting at 59:00.

As with the Crowd funding entry, I was gonna just go ahead and "be bold" editing this entry, but these are not minor changes, and I have a few others, so I wanted to discuss them first. The current Legislative History section's emphasis on one component of the legislative history of the JOBS Act seems unbalanced, but the movement behind the JOBS Act's crowdfunding provision is instructive and interesting, and may merit an entry of its own. Pspinrad (talk) 23:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please go ahead and be bold and make the edits you propose. That the changes aren't minor is far outweighed by the fact that they are strongly supported by the sources you are familiar with. In the unlikely event that anyone has problem with the changes, it's easier to discuss these kinds of things after the fact. Otherwise nobody knows exactly what changes you're proposing. EllenCT (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

References

Trouble archiving links on the article edit

Hello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.

This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.

In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:16, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Is this link problem the reason the article was tagged with an "External links" template? Waters.Justin (talk) 01:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:49, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply