Talk:July Ordinances

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Revert edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have reverted the rather curious edits by 67.86.112.244. I do not understand the purpose or intention of the edits, but they left the article in an even worse state than it was in before --Constantine Evans 01:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to dispute this article's neutrality... edit

It almost seems to be justifying Charles X's actions every step of the way.

"Compelled by what he felt to be a growing, manipulative radicalism in the elected government, Charles felt that as king by right of birth and not parliamentary privilege, his primary duty was the guarantee of order and happiness in France and its people; not in political bipartisanship and the self-interpreted rights of implacable political enemies."

There are clearly strong signs of bias here, and far too much support on the part of Charles X's actions.

Add topic