| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability edit
The subject of this article has written numerous articles in top peer-reviewed journals (see Google scholar search), including several that are quite widely cited. If there is a serious view that the subject is non-notable, please take the article to AfD. Otherwise, please remove the {{notability}} template (and, if you feel it is warranted, add a {{refimprove}} or other template that more squarely addresses any issues you may have with the article).
Regards, Bongomatic 09:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Easily meets PROF #1 as demonstrated by the Nature reference and by papers such as this, currently cited 169 times. This probably means PROF #2 is met. SmartSE (talk) 10:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've removed the notability tag. This person has published lots of work in journals like Nature and Science and has very solid citations to this work – from WoS: 179, 113, 94 (h-index > 20), easily satisfying WP:PROF #1. Tagger is welcome to take this to AfD, but it would likely end in a speedy keep. Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 15:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC).