Talk:Juan Carlos de la Cruz Reyna

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Fiamh in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Juan Carlos de la Cruz Reyna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Fiamh (talk · contribs) 02:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

I'll get to this soon! Fiamh (talk, contribs) 02:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Sorry it took me so long to get back to it. Anyway, this meets all the GA requirements except the image. Non-free images are not allowed for living people on the grounds that it fails NFCC#1, because it theoretically could be created. Fiamh (talk, contribs) 11:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • @Fiamh: I added the image under free-use and think it may quality for NFCC#1. This individual is imprisoned in a maximum-security facility and access is severely limited. The only people to have access to him are his lawyers, family members (assuming they have a visa to travel to the U.S.) and prison staff. I've seen licenses like these specifically for BLP when the individuals are imprisoned and/or disappeared. Let me know what you think. I appreciate you reviewing this. MX () 20:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm going to pass the article per your explanations I'm satisfied that it meets the GA criteria right now. I am hoping for a more comprehesive solution for NFCC on temporarily imprisoned persons, but that doesn't affect the article's current status. Fiamh (talk, contribs) 01:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply