Talk:Joyent
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Shenme in topic Should node.js be listed in factbox
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joyent article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Should node.js be listed in factbox
editNode.js has been run by a foundation since before 4.0, and it specifically was a community decision to exit Joyent's stewardship; this was accomplished through a fork (io.js). I think it's misleading to list Node.js as "a Joyent product". --Sigmundur (talk) 09:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- They can be said to have 'sponsored' node.js for awhile, but then (perhaps after one of the many changes in Joyent leadership?) they used that position to nearly sabotage node.js, its governance, and any contributors that happened not to work for Joyent. They are not "in good odor" in the node.js community, and to see this in the article is like seeing a claim that Napolean made Russia a success. Shenme (talk) 21:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Joyent Public Cloud Closed
edit- McCarthy, Kieren (June 7, 2019). "Samsung goes Marie Kondo on its public cloud outfit: Does this bring me Joyent? Nope. Then in the bin it goes". The Register. Retrieved June 7, 2019.