Talk:Journey of Bhangover
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Film reviews
editI noticed this movie a short while ago at Prime Video: [1]. It seemed of dubious notability at first glance. So I searched for its reviews. And I could find just three (shortish) reviews, out of which at least one might be unreliable:
- Noorani, Reza (29 March 2018). "JOURNEY OF BHANGOVER MOVIE REVIEW". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 12 August 2020.
- Thomas, Johnson (15 December 2017). "Journey of Bhangover: Review, Cast, Story, Director". The Free Press Journal. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 12 August 2020.
- Srivastava, Abhishek (15 December 2017). "Review: हंसी का हैंगओवर है 'जर्नी ऑफ भांगओवर'" [Review: 'Journey of Bhangover' is a hangover of laughter]. Firstpost (in Hindi). Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 12 August 2020.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
I want to add them under the Further reading section, but I am not sure if all of them are suitable for that purpose, e.g. one of them is in Hindi and the other one is published by a dubious-looking newspaper.
So here are a few questions:
- Is The Free Press Journal considered reliable for the Bollywood film reviews? BTW, there seems to be no mention of it at WP:ICTFSOURCES.
- Can one provide non-English sources under the Further reading section of an article?
- On a minor note, the title of the TOI article is in capitals. So, should we mention it in capitals in the citation? I mean, should we provide the title as "
JOURNEY OF BHANGOVER MOVIE REVIEW
" or as "Journey Of Bhangover Movie Review
" in the citation? BTW, {{Template:Cite news}} states the following regarding theSource title
: "The title of the article as it appears in the source
". So I guess it should be in capitals, but I am unsure about it.
I am hardly familiar with sourcing standards of Bollywood film articles. But Cyphoidbomb seems to be well-versed in this area. So he might answer the above questions.
PS: This article was created by Bazzaka to probably promote Prerika Arora (see its revision history). - NitinMlk (talk) 21:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- @NitinMlk: Hey there, sorry for the delay. 1) I think FPJ should be sufficient. It's been around for almost a hundred years, from what I saw in its Wikipedia article. 2) I don't see why we couldn't use non-English sources in the Further reading section. Since you're also noting that it's in Hindi, that pretty much satisfies any suggestion I would have made about it. 3) I would not do all caps for the title. We're allowed to modify even direct quotations for minor things like grammar/punctuation/typography (per MOS:CONFORM) so I would hope we'd be allowed to do normal title case. Hope that helps, and questions are always appreciated. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Cyphoidbomb, thanks for the clarification. I have added them under the "Further reading" section. - NitinMlk (talk) 17:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)