Talk:Journal of Open Source Software
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Egon Willighagen in topic A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- This seems to have been resolved. The source now points to the GitHub repository where the logo and a clear license statement (matching the metadata) can be found. --Egon Willighagen (talk) 15:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Nope this has not been resolved and still is a copyvio. I have proposed the file for deletion accordingly. --Randykitty (talk) 16:43, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Randykitty:, I misunderstood the exact reason of the tag... it's clear to me know. I am trying to get the journal to clarify things, maybe even upload the logo themselves... what would be best practice in your opinion? --Egon Willighagen (talk) 05:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- The easiest thing to do would be to upload it to enWP, not Commons, under fair use (which is not acceptable on Commons). You can do this yourself and the journal doesn't have to change a thing on their website. --Randykitty (talk) 08:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Randykitty:, I misunderstood the exact reason of the tag... it's clear to me know. I am trying to get the journal to clarify things, maybe even upload the logo themselves... what would be best practice in your opinion? --Egon Willighagen (talk) 05:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Randykitty:, hi bot, the original creator of the logo has now uploaded the logo to WikiCommons. I have updated to use this version. Is the issue sufficiently addressed now? If not, what else can the journal and/or creator of the logo do to solve the problem? --Egon Willighagen (talk) 16:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)