Talk:Joub Jannine

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lebanon Low‑importance

	Lebanon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Acheuleen I or II edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for this article, very interesting. Although it seems to be logic to call the oldest stratum Joub Jannine I, it is named Joub Jannine II in the texts that I read, e.g. John Shea's Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide, p. 74. This Wikipedia article sees Joub Jannine II rather as a neolithic site? Does anybody have an explanation? --Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic