Talk:Josh Lewis and Reva Shayne

Untitled

• Yikes! The plot of this article as it is now is overly long, so much so that this article itself is suggesting that it be split into two separate articles; really, it's suggesting that at this moment. Well, luckily for this article, I am currently working on improving all of the soap couple articles on Wikipedia. While I, of course, understand the fact that articles on Wikipedia shouldn't only provide plot summaries, all of these soap opera couple articles will be worked on and formatted to fit Wikipedia policy, which is why Wikipedia: WikiProject Soap Operas exists, and is why I ask other editors to hold off on nominating these soap opera couple articles for deletion. To go around and delete these soap opera popular and or supercouple articles is not the answer. Clean-up is. I will get around to fixing up this article, in which will be soon. Flyer22 22:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, when I can. Flyer22 09:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Hopefully that will be soon. I was trying to read this and do some brush up and it took 3 hours to get through it. The storyline is so horribly overdetailed, and ventures into daily show plot detail much too much. Then suddenly, it jumps from Reva acting strangely to her about to commit suicide because she's dying. The actual explanation is hardly touched upon, except in retrospect. Very confusing!! Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:JoshReva.jpg

Image:JoshReva.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Unsourced Conjecture

The last sentence of the article "What's next no one knows. Though all of the die hard 'Jeva' fans really want a Josh and Reva to get back together. Who knows what's to come upon Josh's return to the show in a few weeks." is unsourced conjecture and will be deleted unless there is adequate rationale for it being allowed. 143.55.235.80 (talk) 15:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Josh Lewis and Reva Shayne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100906220936/http://soapoperadigest.com/features/supercouples/ to http://soapoperadigest.com/features/supercouples/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)