This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joseph Berchtold article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Joseph Berchtold has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 9, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph Berchtold/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 14:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Prose
edit- Repeating the same citation over and over again next to each other is unnecessary Done
- Section headers that are like "Career in the ..." could be rewritten as "... career" (suggestion only) Done
- Second paragraph in lead should be split Done Kierzek (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 15:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Passing, well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Kierzek (talk) 21:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 6, 2024. |