Talk:Jorge Choquetarqui/GA1

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Sammi Brie in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Krisgabwoosh (talk · contribs) 05:09, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Let's do it right.

Hi Sammi! Thank you for opening another review. I just wanted to inform you that I'm in Bolivia for the month, so I may not be super quick responding. Cheers! Krisgabwoosh (talk) 05:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Sammi Brie: Sorry for the wait. I'll get this done now. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Not much to do: just a question about the origins of a ref and textual claim for [9]. Ping when done. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 06:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

edit

I cannot find any copy items to change. I spent several passes looking through this one. Very rare for me to say that.

Sourcing and spot checks

edit
  • What makes Bolivia Decide (a blog) reliable?
  • The blog is actually a mirror site that takes news articles from other publications and republishes them. Therefore, I'm certain it's a republication of a reliable source. Unfortunately, due to link rot, the original source isn't easily searchable, and since the original publication is not cited, I can't even track it down on the Internet Archive. I debated keeping it in, since it has biographical information I couldn't find elsewhere. I decided to add it and leave its inclusion up to the discretion of the GA reviewer. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • 9: Not very said in source, though support and threats of withdrawal of support are noted. Would like to hear a justification.
  • The article mentions that within the span of a week, Choquetarqui's organization went from marching across the country to support the president to threatening to withdraw all its support. In that sense, I think phrases like "fluctuated one a dime" are pretty supported by the text. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • 14: News article on protests led by Choquetarqui against teachers' strike.  Y
  • 16: Listing in directory of committees shows Choquetarqui in the given positions.  Y
  • 17: El diputado alteño Jorge Choquetarqui fue elegido como jefe de la bancada paceña del Movimiento Al Socialismo (MAS), informó el senador Eugenio Rojas. “Ellos (Choquetarqui y la subjefa de bancada) van a entrar a debatir el lunes a las seis de la tarde, con otros jefes nuevos, que van a direccionar este año”, informó el legislador.  Y
  • 19: See 14

Images

edit

As is usual, the headshot is CC-BY-2.0 and the signature is PD.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.