Talk:Jonathan Kaplan (rugby union)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

Use of opinion on whether Kaplan was lenient in the France v England game? Hardly a fact ?

Geoffmss 19:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Jonothan Kaplan should be banned from refereeing due to being so biased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.40.227.81 (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Comments such as the preceding are not appropriate here.-- Jimmy Pitt (talk) 16:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jonathon O'Kaplan has been shown to be extremely biased over many years —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.69.199.127 (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense! It's true that a few days ago one of England's coaches came close to accusing him of bias in the Wales v England match, but compare that with Planet Rugby's comments in its report on the same game: "First let's give Jonathan Kaplan a well deserved mention. A lot has been said of the standard of the officials of late, but this was a fine display from the South African. He controlled the breakdown and allowed the game to flow. Well done sir, take a bow on behalf of referees."
Jonathan Kaplan (not Jonathon O'Kaplan) has made mistakes, just like every other referee, but he wouldn't be ranked as one of the top referees in the world if those who assess and rank referees suspected even for a moment that he was biased. And as he has refereed more test matches than any other rugby union referee, it's pretty clear that the sport's administrators don't share your opinion. Unless you can cite a reliable source to demonstrate his bias (and I don't regard the whinges of losing coaches and fans as "reliable"), such comments (which verge on libel) have no place here. In this regard I refer you to the box at the top of this page and to WP:DISCUSSION, which advises that "Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject".- Jimmy Pitt (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jonathan Kaplan (rugby union). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jonathan Kaplan (rugby union). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply