Talk:Jon Stryker

Latest comment: 4 years ago by OlEnglish in topic help

Non-verified content

edit

I work at Rubenstein and we represent The Arcus Foundation. The fraud allegations levied against Stryker Corporation do not belong on the Jon Stryker page. It is highly non-relevant to the subject of the article. Furthermore, the entry and the citation both freely admit there is “no evidence of family fraud". Failing to meet BLP standards as a non-sourced allegation, it has since been removed. //Brycetom (talk) 18:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jon Stryker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

help

edit

Help Samuel obuobi (talk) 02:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

What do you need help with? -- œ 02:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply