Talk:Jon Paul Fiorentino

Allegations of sexual misconduct

As per the WP:BLP "Public figures" instructions, I am waiting for multiple sources before I include the sexual harassment allegations currently under investigation at Concordia University.

Here's the first source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/prominent-montreal-writers-investigated-in-concordia-sexual-misconduct-allegations-inquiry-1.4552716

Allanaaaaaaa (talk) 14:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

I've added a second source. --13ab37 (talk) 19:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

I've added back in information about the sexual misconduct allegations as I believe they are relevant to his teaching career since they happened at Concordia, and it is the reason he is not currently teaching any classes. Endwealth (talk) 03:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Not worthy

This "article" reads like shameless self-promotion for a prof who has a hard time differentiating himself from a college boy.

Cute references to a personal CV, a dead webpage, and fake blog, however. 'Credibility' is a bitch to come by, so why not stoke the old ego?

I don't think Fiorentino deserves an article. To call him a minor figure in Canadian literature is greatly exaggerating his stature. He is just a middling professor without a doctorate and his published work is read by virtually no one. It also seems like he may have written this article himself. I say delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John doucheman (talk • contribs) 23:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

• If you think the article should be deleted, you should make an entry at Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion, not nominate this talk page for deletion. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jon Paul Fiorentino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070220095939/http://www.jonpaulfiorentino.com/ to http://www.jonpaulfiorentino.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100108032300/http://www.hour.ca/books/books.aspx?iIDArticle=16669 to http://www.hour.ca/books/books.aspx?iIDArticle=16669
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090511025050/http://www.danforthreview.com/features/interviews/fiorentino.htm to http://www.danforthreview.com/features/interviews/fiorentino.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828003917/http://www.montrealmirror.com/ARCHIVES/2003/010903/nm2003_art3.html to http://www.montrealmirror.com/ARCHIVES/2003/010903/nm2003_art3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)