Talk:Jon Crowcroft

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

As someone who knows Professor Crowcroft I can vouch for the accuracy of the information, and its impartiality. I volunteer to write a new page on the subject if required.

Likewise. MalcolmScott (talk) 16:29, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

And he certainly is sufficiently notable for a Wikipedia article. Jpgs (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the autobiography tag. The information is all factual and impartial, citations have been added, and from my personal knowledge I believe it is correct, so I believe it conforms to a NPOV. Mhandley 14:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

There are now quotation marks around the SIGCOMM citation: http://www.sigcomm.org/awards/sigcomm-awards - it's embarrassing in the extreme for Wikipedia to still be flagging an article about Jon Crowcroft of all people. Or is this a subtle sense of humour on the part of the editors? [User: CMarsden] 07 May 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.152.104 (talk) 09:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jon Crowcroft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090615030959/http://fellows.acm.org/homepage.cfm?alpha=C&srt=alpha to http://fellows.acm.org/homepage.cfm?alpha=C&srt=alpha

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic